A regulatory detail deep within the thicket of FDA rules is getting sharp attention. This week, HHS Secretary RFK Jr. asked FDA to find a way to restrict something called GRAS. That stands for generally recognized as safe. Right now, a food company can “self certify” that a chemical food additive is GRAS. Then they can put it in our food supply without asking permission or even telling food regulators at FDA.
Kennedy explained that he wants to put an end to this:
“For far too long, ingredient manufacturers and sponsors have exploited a loophole that has allowed new ingredients and chemicals, often with unknown safety data, to be introduced into the U.S. food supply without notification to the FDA or the public. Eliminating this loophole will provide transparency to consumers, help get our nation’s food supply back on track by ensuring that ingredients being introduced into foods are safe, and ultimately Make America Healthy Again.”
A Jolt for Big Food
No doubt, this is a jolt for the food industry. Because of GRAS, it is uniquely easy to add chemicals into the U.S. food supply without the nuisance of trying to prove to a regulator that they’re safe. But the industry is cautious in public comments. Speaking for the Consumer Brands Association, an industry lobbying organization, Sarah Gallo said:
“FDA’s generally recognized as safe process plays an important role in enabling companies to innovate to meet consumer demand. As the administration looks to revise GRAS, we stand ready to work with agency experts on continued analysis of safe ingredients and increase consumer transparency.”
Translated from lobby-speak, that means they don’t like this change.
A Jarring Contrast
This move won praise from some progressive food policy advocates. Peter Lurie, President of CSPI and an FDA official for the Obama administration, said “It’s certainly a promising development.”
But it’s jarring to hear the same administration in the same week move to restrict GRAS while it brags about loosening restrictions on toxic chemical pollution in our air and water. This is a odd mix of policies and we will be watching to see what actually happens.
Click here, here, and here for more on this development.
Jesus Summons Matthew to Leave the Tax Office, painting by Jan van Hemessen / WikiArt
Subscribe by email to follow the accumulating evidence and observations that shape our view of health, obesity, and policy.


March 16, 2025 at 8:04 am, Jeanne Blankenship, MS RDN said:
The challenge will be how to evaluate, monitor and enforce such a change without adequate personnel at FDA. It will be interesting to watch this play out.
March 16, 2025 at 8:51 pm, Mary Hastings Hager said:
I’m just not certain about what exactly is the problem. Right now, all I read is politicization of GRAS. Individuals needs to go to the website and see those food “chemicals” that are GRAS and it’s pretty innocuous. Those more recent are for animal food or drink, and those are evaluated by the FDA.
Just go to:https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animal-food-feeds/generally-recognized-safe-gras-notification-program. Read the rule and the list, and then comment.
March 17, 2025 at 8:56 am, David Brown said:
The ingredients-in-food issue is getting a lot of attention lately; ingredients-in-feed – not really an issue. It should be. (1919) “Seed mixtures, no matter how complex or what seeds they are derived from, will never induce optimal nutrition. The only successful combination of natural foods or milled products for the nutrition of an animal are combinations of seeds or other milled products with sufficient amounts of the leaves of plants.” (The Newer Knowledge of Nutrition by E.V. McCollum)
More recently, “We now know that major changes have taken place in the food supply over the last 100 years, when food technology and modern agriculture led to enormous production of vegetable oils high in ω-6 fatty acids, and changed animal feeds from grass to grains, thus increasing the amount of ω-6 fatty acids at the level of linoleic acid (LA) (from oils) and arachidonic acid (AA) (from meat, eggs, dairy).” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5093368/
Purdue University researchers also express concern about human food derived from livestock that eat oilseed rations. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/16/3550